Depending on who you ask, there is either no conclusive evidence or very strong evidence that separating boys and girls in school is effective.
From singlesexschools.org:
"Researchers at Stetson University in Florida have completed a three-year pilot project comparing single-sex classrooms with coed classrooms at Woodward Avenue Elementary School, a nearby neighborhood public school. For example, students in the 4th grade at Woodward were assigned either to single-sex or coed classrooms. All relevant parameters were matched: the class sizes were all the same, the demographics were the same, all teachers had the same training in what works and what doesn't work, etc. On the FCAT (Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test), here were the results:
Percentage of students scoring proficient on the FCAT
Remember, these students were all learning the same curriculum in the same school. And, this school "mainstreams" students who are learning-disabled, or who have ADHD etc. Many of those boys who scored proficient in the all-boys classes had previously been labeled "ADHD" or "ESE" in coed classes."boys in coed classes: 37% scored proficient
girls in coed classes: 59% scored proficient
girls in single-sex classes: 75% scored proficient
boys in single-sex classes: 86% scored proficient.
Ok, so it looks pretty promising. But I can't help but wonder what other effects might come of this... in the real world, men and women interact on a daily basis, so wouldn't this create a bunch of very socially awkward kids? Isn't socialization the most important part of public school?
I really don't know what to think. My initial reaction is not terribly positive, but have I just been brainwashed into being too politically correct? If this really works and helps both genders, than why not? I think that it's generally accepted that there are real gender differences (or perhaps we should call them sexual differences since gender is a social construct whereas sex is biological), but for some reason it is not ok to really talk about it.
NOW is not cool with it (not surprisingly, doesn't it sound an awful lot like "separate but equal"?) but from what I've been reading, it sounds like boys are getting the raw end of the deal in our school system these days, a huge reversal from a few decades ago, so my gut feeling is this isn't really discriminatory against women. If anything, this is almost geared more towards helping boys, and I don't think the feminist agenda is to destroy little boys.
Single-sex advocates argue that the key to successfully teaching boys and girls separately is to really understand gender differences instead of making sweeping generalizations like "boys like to build robots and girls would rather read about unicorns."
Wait, wasn't there a Simpsons episode where Lisa and Bart are put in separate classrooms, and Lisa pretends to be a boy to get into the boys' class?
A few more stories on the topic:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/education/11gender.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13229488/ns/us_news-education/
I'm curious to hear what you think. Is this weird? Is it wrong? Or could it be the answer?